ATP Men’s Tennis Rankings Explained

Ever wondered how the ATP men’s tennis rankings work? Find out in this article written by OnCourtAdvantage.

Grand Slam country flags at Roland Garros. A Grand Slam singles champion earns 2000 ranking points.

The ATP World Tour rankings can be quite difficult to follow and understand. There are a number of rules, special exceptions, penalties, things that apply to some and are different for others and a bonus points event. Just to name a few!

In order to keep this post short and sweet I will focus on the main factors that determine the rankings in professional tennis.

A large number of people follow the world’s elite or highest ranked players so I’ll zoom in on what applies to a Top 30 player.

The current ranking system calculates how many points a player earns over a 12-month period. This 12-month period is not a calendar year but a rolling 12-month period. Currently the rankings represent the 12-month period of ranking points tallied from 17 January 2011 through to 16 January 2012.

Rankings are updated weekly throughout the year, except when a grand slam is underway they are updated after the tournament.

How each player earns a particular ranking number like World No.1 is based purely on whether his total ranking points tally is greater than other players.

As at Monday 16 January Novak Djokovic is World No.1 due to having the highest points tally, 13,630 and Rafael Nadal is No.2 because he has the second highest tally, 9,595.

The trick is that it is NOT just the total points earned. There is a system called the “Best 18” which is used to arrive at a players’ ranking points total.

In terms of calculating a players ranking, a best result is defined as the highest number of ranking points earned in a tournament.

It does not factor in the perceived quality by the public of the tournaments or the calibre of opponent he defeats. For example, winning an ATP Tour 500 tournament like Memphis will yield more ranking points than making the quarter finals of a Grand Slam. Australian Open quarter finalists Juan Martin del Potro, Tomas Berdych, Kei Nishikori and David Ferrer all earn 360 ATP points.

For the players in the Top 30 their best 18 tournament results must include (even if it is NOT one of their best tournament results): all four Grand Slam results and eight of the nine ATP Tour Masters 1000 results (not including Monte Carlo) unless the player plays all 9 Masters 1000 events then he can have his best eight count.

The Grand Slams and the 8 Masters 1000 results account for 12 tournaments.  The remaining 6 results MUST come from the player’s best four ATP 500 events and his best two ATP 250 results.

For the Top 8 players who qualify for the year-end ATP Tour Finals and any player who plays as an alternate, they are rewarded for their calendar year results with the bonus of having the points they earn at the ATP Tour Finals added in addition to their best 18.

In each of the abovementioned tournaments the number of ranking points a player wins depends on how many rounds he progresses through and what category that particular tournament has been graded.

The higher the tournament is graded or categorised the more ranking points are awarded in each round of that event. The further a player wins through a tournament, the greater number of ranking points he receives for each victory.

The highest category events are the Grand Slams.

  • A Grand Slam singles champion earns 2,000 ATP ranking points.
  • The next highest total possible is 1,500 ranking points to an undefeated ATP Tour Finals champion like Roger Federer in London 2011.
  • The next highest possible totals for the singles champions are as the tournament category suggests Masters 1000 (1,000 points), ATP 500 (500 points) and ATP 250 (250 points).

Andy Murray is ranked right up there with Federer and Nadal due to the fact that his best 6 results in 2011 were 1,200 for being the runner-up in last year’s Australian Open final, winning 1,000 points each with the Shanghai and Cincinnati Masters 1000 titles and earning 720 points 3 times by making the semi finals of Roland Garros, Wimbledon and the US Open.

As you can see, achieving your best possible ranking requires you to consistently win deep into the most prestigious 12 tournaments and to play a full tournament schedule. There are many other factors like the veteran’s rule, Davis Cup points and having a compulsory zero included in your best 18 if you skip a required event. However, I have covered the main factors to that make up most of the ATP men’s rankings picture.

Do you have any further queries about the ATP Tour Rankings? If so, please leave a comment below.

Visit fellow Australian Open FAN-bassador OnCourtAdvantage.com for coverage of both the WTA and ATP Tour tournaments throughout the year.

View the current ATP Singles Rankings.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

9 Responses to “ATP Men’s Tennis Rankings Explained” »

  1. Comment by Sarah @ LittleNotebook — January 27, 2012 @ 6:06 am

    What a great article – really helps show how the top 4 men at the moment are so far ahead of the game! They certainly do have to work really hard to keep their top spots in the rankings because if they have a few bad tournaments they can really lose a stack of points (and rankings!).

  2. Comment by grandslamgal — January 29, 2012 @ 5:34 am

    Thanks for your comment Sarah. It does show that the men need to play all the big tournaments (Grand Slams and Masters 1000s) and do well in order to lift and keep their rankings. It will be interesting to find out more about which players are playing less tournaments this year due to the Olympics too.

  3. Comment by Cindy — January 30, 2012 @ 5:07 am

    What I don’t understand, (this happened when Nadal lost his first place ranking I believe). Since he had won the previous year tournament, and won it again the next year, the points did not count toward any ranking. Is that true for all tournaments or just that one?

  4. Comment by Josh — February 15, 2012 @ 9:03 pm

    Hey OnCourtAdvantage,

    I am a college tennis player in my last semester of school. I am taking a Senior Seminar Economics/Finance class and have to develop a thesis paper with literature review and the whole nine yards. I am contemplating researching the ATP ranking/seeding system and its flaws. Would you be able to direct me towards literature on the subject.

    Thank you in advance,

    Josh

  5. Comment by Vibhu batra — March 26, 2012 @ 9:33 pm

    @Cindy :: see, last best 18 results as discussed….

    Let’s say, Rafa isn’t able to Defend his French Open title & loses in the final to Roger..

    In that case, 2000 pts that he gathered by winning French Open in 2011 will no longer be added
    in to his best 18 results, so naturally his points will fall as earlier 2000 were included & now only 1200 points….

    so, in a way, a notional loss of 800 points if u lose the final of a grand slam if u are the defending champion…

    Just for Every one’s info, ATP changed the ranking system in 2001 (I guess so)…. The ranking system was so easy to understand for illiterates like me ;) ….

    But, the easiest to u-stand are the current year rankings :-) …. Hope, I could make some sense in all this explanation :)

  6. Comment by caers K — May 8, 2012 @ 9:52 am

    i just don’t get how djokovic lost 1000 points by skipping the belgrade open (ATP 250), he won it last year.
    And how does Nadal lose points despite winning monte carlo like he did last year?

    Can anyone explain?

  7. Comment by Ramesh — May 11, 2012 @ 3:33 am

    Why Nadal got 500 extra this week, as he defended his 1000 points in Monte-Carlo. last week he has 9215 points and now he has 9715 points.

  8. Comment by Ramesh — May 11, 2012 @ 3:34 am

    What is the difference between one year and two year ranking system in Tennis

  9. Comment by vibhu batra — May 14, 2012 @ 7:39 am

    @Ramesh & @caers K

    I explained your qtns in a new post on our RF fans site…. Read on here —

    http://www.rogerfedererfans.com/forum/topic/267-will-roger-federer-or-rafael-nadal-get-no-2-seeding-at-french-open-2012-after-italian-open-2012/

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

e-storage pro Wordpress Theme
Terms & Conditions Privacy Policy